Buckeye Agricultural Radio Network | BARN | Ag Radio
    About Us   Blogs   News   BARN TV   Audio   Calendar   Stations   Contact Us   Home
Agriculture news and rural lifestyle
« This Week's Column: Congress Writes the Budget, Not the PresidentTravelling to Cover the News »

HSUS Is Back To End Livestock Farming in Ohio

02/01/10

HSUS Is Back To End Livestock Farming in Ohio

It was only a matter of time, and the time was today. The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), a self-declared "sophisticated political organization," submitted a petition to Ohio’s Attorney General in support of placing an anti-cruelty measure on the statewide November ballot. The proposed measure would allow voters to require the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board to adopt standards that will effectively end livestock production in Ohio by making it economically unfeasible to feed chickens, hogs, or cattle in the state.

Utilizing a large corps of paid petition circulators, the group will seek to collect more than 600,000 signatures of registered Ohio voters upon approval of the petition forms by the Secretary of State. In doing so, they will attempt to circumvent the will of the Ohio voters in passing the measure to create the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board last November.

HSUS, it is widely known, is a radical activist organization dedicated to reducing and replacing animal-derived proteins and products from the human lifestyle. Equating animals with humans, they passionately believe that domesticated pets and livestock should have the same rights as every American citizen, and firmly hold that no animal should be consumed for food. Led by charismatic lobbyist Wayne Pacelle, the organization has organized in Ohio under the banner "Ohioans for Humane Farms," though applying the label "Ohioans" to the campaign organization is extremely duplicitous. HSUS is a Washington, DC based fundraising and lobbying organization, and the campaign committee is supported, not by Ohio citizens, but by other Animal Rights extremists like Farm Sanctuary and the so-called Center for Science in the Public Interest.

Earlier this month, in response to the earthquake in Haiti, HSUS began a massive fundrasing effort ostensibly to "save the animals" in that impoverished nation. Unfortunately, those funds will most likely be spent in Ohio to deprive farmers of their right to farm profitably, and to deprive consumers of their right to buy safe, affordable, locally produced food. The organization successfully raised over $34 million in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and in reality spent less than 18% of the money to aid in relief and recovery efforts in Louisiana, launching a nearly two year investigation by that state's Attorney General.

HSUS continues to use lies, falsehoods, and half-truths to promote its vegan agenda. In the press release announcing their latest move, for example, the group claimed the measure would prevent so-called "downer" animals, or those too weak or injured to stand or walk, from entering the food chain. That declaration, of course, failed to note that downer animals are currently precluded from entering the food chain at any federally-inspected meat processing facility in the country.

Likewise, the organization cited an infamous HBO "documentary" about an alleged case of animal abuse in Ohio earlier this decade. Claiming "Ohio’s agribusiness community hailed the acquittal [of the accused abuser] as a 'huge victory,' because Ohio has no law specifically requiring humane farm animal euthanasia methods," HSUS did a double-play of duplicity. First and foremost, no one in agriculture "hailed the acquittal as a huge victory." By the time the case was concluded, farmers and farm organizations had soundly and completely denounced the situation and stated clearly and decisively that farmers in no way, shape, or form supported any actions remotely resembling those depicted in the HBO film.

Even beyond that obvious and glaring lie, the bigger issue is that HSUS clearly and completely ignores the fact that Congress passed a law known as the "Humane Methods of Slaughter Act" way back in 1958, and strengthened it again in 1978 and 2002. That act provides for very clear rules and regulations about how animals are to be humanely dispatched at the end of their productive life cycle.

In their own press release on the activist effort, Farm Sanctuary shared this: “Ohioans oppose cruelty and believe that all animals, including farm animals, deserve to be protected,” said Gene Baur, president of Farm Sanctuary. “In November, Ohioans will have the opportunity to make their voices heard and phase out some of the worst factory farm abuses.”

Actually, Mr. Baur, Ohioans already made their voices heard LAST November. You and Wayne were too busy raising money for your own selfish agendas to notice. The overwhelming majority of Ohioans, you see, decided the best course of action was to assemble a group of Ohio citizens, experts and stakeholders all, to enact and enforce minimum standards to ensure that all animals are "protected" from any and all forms of abuse. Why not wait until the Board is fully vested and organized before giving them your marching orders?

Good question, and here's the answer: if the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board is allowed to do its job and enact minimum standards, HSUS is no longer the controlling body in the conversation. To this point, HSUS has bullied legislators, regulators, voters, and farmers in states like California and Michigan, forcing them to adopt standards completely beyond the realm of science of reason. The Board will adopt standards in everyone's best interest, including the best interests of farmers and consumers, two groups for which HSUS has no concern. Secondly, if the Board is left to do its work, HSUS can't further fatten its already gluttonous war chest. By declaring war on Ohio farmers and consumers, Wayne, Gene, and their staff of thousands can con unsuspecting citizens into donating to their efforts to "save the animals."

In reality, of course, they'll be taking food off their own table, and helping Wayne and company put food on theirs instead.

6 comments

Comment from: Tim [Visitor]
Wasn't Issue 2 sold as a way to prevent this from happening? Why were all the farmers asked to donate and support more regulation if HSUS and other anti-cruelty groups could still do a ballot measure in Ohio? And you think HSUS is the one that's deceptive?!
02/01/10 @ 16:12
Comment from: Andy Vance [Member] Email · http://www.buckeyeag.com
Tim, please don't miss the point of the Board, or of my post. Nothing deceptive on the part of Ohio farmers and the consumers who soundly passed Issue 2 last fall. The impetus is exactly what we've always said: so that the power to regulate Livestock Care in Ohio is left to Ohio citizens and Ohio experts. What HSUS is purporting to do here is to force, by ballot initiative, the Livestock Care Standards Board to do its bidding.

It is my personal belief, and supported by no more than my own basic understanding of civics, that if HSUS were to succeed that it would set into motion a judicial process to see what, if any, binding effect the HSUS proposal would have on the Board. I'm not convinced that they can, Constitutionally speaking, bind the Board to do what they think they can.

So, setting the tone of your post aside, Ohio consumers and farmers need to continue telling HSUS "No, thank you" to their efforts at ending livestock farming and meat consumption in our state.
02/01/10 @ 16:44
Comment from: Kenny T. [Visitor]
I respect your point of view, but we can’t rewrite history. The Ohio agribusiness community did hail the acquittal in the Wiles cruelty case. Dick Isler of the Ohio Pork Producers Council called it a “huge victory” in the July 2, 2007 issue of Feedstuffs. As well, I hardly think that asking that animals be able to turn around and extend their limbs (what this new proposal calls for) will destroy animal agriculture.
02/01/10 @ 16:54
Comment from: Andy Vance [Member] Email · http://www.buckeyeag.com
Kenny - As a reporter who's been living in Ohio and covering agriculture in Ohio for nearly a decade, I stand by my earlier observation and assessment of how the farm community in Ohio felt about the Wiles case. To prevent either you or myself from "rewriting history," I've located this link to the Feedstuffs story, which provides some context you neglected to share in the Isler quote. From the full quote: "The judge saw through the animal rights activists’ hidden cameras and trumped up charges and determined that what was happening on the Wiles farms, except for the one case, was acceptable,” Isler said.

Furthermore, if you read this follow up story I think you'll note that not only did the agricultural community not support animal abuse in any way, shape, or form, the industry insured that the farm in question and the family involved received extensive training, follow up, and indeed went through significant changes in their handling of animals both on-site, and in transport to and from the farm.

Finally, the premise of your statement about animals "being able to turn around and extend their limbs" is the problem. This issue isn't about animals ability to move in their living quarters, but about who will control livestock regulations in Ohio. And, your notion that it won't harm animal agriculture is naive at best. But, don't take my word for it, just ask California's poultry industry, which, the Wall Street Journal reports, is packing its bags and leaving the sunshine state.
02/01/10 @ 17:14
Comment from: B. Wenner [Visitor] Email
Andy,
As always, I appreciate your commentary and efforts on behalf of the farmers in Ohio. Myself being a student debater in defense of Ohio and Midwestern livestock production, I would greatly appreciate you sending me the background for your statistics about HSUS and their fundraising/spending. We have a long year ahead of us. Hopefully we can lead Ohioans to be patient with the board's progress and to see the truth of animal production.
02/02/10 @ 11:57
Comment from: Stephen [Visitor] · http://stephenhopkins.wordpress.com/
Andy:

While we disagreed about Issue 2, but with both of us wanting to fight HSUS and protect Ohio farmers, that is in the past. I am with you shoulder to shoulder to fight this insipid enemy.

If I might be able to offer my post about the subject:

http://stephenhopkins.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/stalinist-hsus-at-it-again-in-ohio/
02/02/10 @ 12:54

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
Ag Radio Network
About Us   Blogs   News   BARN TV   Audio   Calendar   Stations   Contact Us   Home
©2008 AdVance Broadcast and Communication, Ltd. All Rights Reserved